As all buyers (should) know, sellers market their products in a very positive light, especially via photos, hiding behind the not-so-presentable stuff and plunging their customer into disappointment after finding defects after their purchase. To me, even bling-bling items fail to appear bling if they were not to my expectations. So, I'd decided to try to evaluate each jewellery item that I'd bought to let other potential customers make a better decision. I'm not wealthy, so don't expect me to purchase bling-bling items which have extra charges =)
SB1278:
I like to scrutinise my stuff really well. One or two of the jewels near the neck of the loop for this necklace are duller than the rest. I tried to capture this on photo, but this is the best macro shot that I can get on my handphone camera. Not an obvious defect though. I thought the jewel was only framed without a support at the back, but it is not so:
SNS 4616:
This little silver fella certainly attracted attention when I had it over my neck. Of all things, why would someone have a silver ladybug as a pendant? Well, it's probably just due to my bizarre taste in accessories. It is hollow at the back (it appeared rather solid and hardy in the seller's pictures), so it isn't as heavy as it looks.
SB1529:
It wasn't an easy feat for me to open it before and after I had put it on. This shouldn't be a problem for people who wear watches with metallic straps, since the latch resembles that of those watches. Some minor scratches can be observed, but no biggie:
SNS4993:
On first look, this pendant looks like a pretty gem. And yes it is so, until you look at it from the side. Oh my, why is the frontal jewel so big and ill-fitting over the groove that it protrudes out?
SNS2657:
I thought this was well-made (no protruding or dull jewels or scratched surfaces) till I inspected the pearl. What a waste, it was glued at the wrong spot, so the junction which two parts of the pearl were annealed together shows, resulting in two different shades of white on the surface.
SE1883:
I was scratching my head when I saw this item.. Did I really order this? Or was it a mistake? I had to double-check online as well as my own records. Sometimes my idiosyncratic and rapidly-shifting sense of fashion bewilders me.
Anyway, I dislike the fact that there is no groove for the stud to be secured in a place. Is there a medical term for the fear of having one's ear being squashed between an earring and the stud? Let's coin it larky-ear-syndrome ok?
SE 4017:
Think this pair of earrings has been kept for a pretty long time, as the pearls as well as the paper earring holder are yellowed. Pits and poor glueing can be seen on the surface of the pearls as well. Upsetting. Even my trashbin was upset when I tossed the pair in.
Bonus item:
Ahh, a tool to compensate for the inadequacies of the purchased items and pacify the upset customer? =p This is probably another marketing ploy to get gullible and greedy customers *guilty look* to buy more than what they had initially intended to get. Always be wary of freebies since most sellers tend to give away stuff that they do not want. Fortunately I didn't skip that crucial step, for there is one terminal end of the earring (that is to be put through the earhole) with a sharp pointy edge that promises a nick on the fragile skin of the ear lobe. That will not be very pleasant for someone who has larky-ear-syndrome.
On the whole, the items which I had received from Style-Am2Pm are of decent quality and good price (wait for the $0.50 deal! I bought mine at $0.70 though). Some minor defects can be seen, but they are still reasonable, except for that "dangerous" bonus item. I'm sure no one examines the jewellery you wear with such hawk-eyed scrutiny, isn't it?
Price: $0.70 (0.50 cheapest!) each + $2 shipping
Rating: 7.5/10